FinNexus Finished
Notice: This page is a freshly imported case study from the original repository. The original content was in a different format, and may not have relevant information for all sections. Please help restructure the content by moving information from the 'About' and 'General Prevention' sections to other sections, and add any missing information or sources you can find. If you are new here, please read General Tutorial on Wikis or Anatomy of a Case Study for help getting started.
Notice: This page contains sources which are not attributed to any text. The unattributed sources follow the initial description. Please assist by visiting each source, reviewing the content, and placing that reference next to any text it can be used to support. Feel free to add any information that you come across which isn't present already. Sources which don't contain any relevant information can be removed. Broken links can be replaced with versions from the Internet Archive. See General Tutorial on Wikis, Anatomy of a Case Study, and/or Citing Your Sources Guide for additional information. Thanks for your help!
The FinNexus smart contract was fully audited, and most reports suggest that this was the breach of a key which allows for management of the smart contract.
For some reason, the team decided that they would have only one key, and share it amongst themselves. The official story is that malware has gotten onto one of the computers, allowing a hacker to make off with the funds.
In response the platform plans to rename itself, and offer some form of compensation for affected users, however it is not clear what the compensation will be.
This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]
About FinNexus
"FinNexus Options makes it easy to buy and exercise BTC, ETH, LINK, SNX, and MKR options in a secure and decentralized way on Ethereum & Wanchain." "The project was initiated by a group of blockchain industry veterans in 2019 with a focus on offering new DeFi products that offer greater diversity, convenience, and value to investors."
"The decentralized options platform reported the incursion on its Twitter feed in the late hours of May 17." "It called it a smart contract hack but industry experts have refuted the claim, suggesting it was a stolen private key for the administrator account."
"According to community feedback and data on the chain, the token FNX of the on-chain option agreement FinNexus has been minted, transferred or sold in a large amount in a short period of time, involving more than 300 million FNX tokens (approximately US$7 million) in BSC and Ethereum , Some users reported that the owner authority of the project contract was previously modified. The FinNexus team stated that it is currently investigating this issue."
"Part of the hardware powering FinNexus has been compromised by malware, in what appears to be a targeted attack on our platform. An unknown hacker infiltrated the FinNexus system and managed to recover the private key to the ownership of the FNX token contract."
"According to the FinNexus team, the ERC-20 smart contract has been hacked." "Others questioned the validity of FinNexus’s hack claims, suggesting that the attack might also have been conducted by one of the project’s disgruntled employees." "[I]ndustry experts believe that the developers themselves could have been the cause of the incident, since someone gained access to the administrator key. The developers have already urged users to withdraw funds from the pools."
"“We regret to inform our traders and investors that the FinNexus erc20 contract appears to have been hacked. For security reasons, withdraw your funds from the pools,” the project’s Twitter page says."
"At the time of this writing, the developers of the protocol did not say what exactly caused the change of address. The developers again called for the withdrawal of cryptocurrency from all pools, as well as to avoid buying FNX on exchanges."
"As soon as the attack took place we notified the exchanges we operate on to stop trading FNX, while our developers performed checks across the board on our contracts to make sure they were not compromised. Rest assured that the private keys to the owner of other FinNexus contracts are safe and no code flaw has been exploited."
"We are currently in contact with centralized exchanges as well as with our partners at Wanchain — the cross-chain portal — to mitigate adverse effects on our users and trace the hacked funds, in a concerted effort to freeze them."
"A new statement with relevant details will be forthcoming soon, covering all the information about the relaunch of the token and the FinNexus protocol."
"[T]une in for an AMA with our co-founders @BorisYangFNX and @rainiefield. All your questions about the hack, the compensation, and FinNexus' relaunch plan answered!"
"As part of a wider effort to rebrand and bring new products to our users, FinNexus is about to change its name."
"We thank all our users and community members, investors and traders for their support and trust at this peculiar time."
This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.
The background of the exchange platform, service, or individuals involved, as it would have been seen or understood at the time of the events.
Include:
- Known history of when and how the service was started.
- What problems does the company or service claim to solve?
- What marketing materials were used by the firm or business?
- Audits performed, and excerpts that may have been included.
- Business registration documents shown (fake or legitimate).
- How were people recruited to participate?
- Public warnings and announcements prior to the event.
Don't Include:
- Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
- Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.
There could be more than one section here. If the same platform is involved with multiple incidents, then it can be linked to a main article page.
The Reality
This sections is included if a case involved deception or information that was unknown at the time. Examples include:
- When the service was actually started (if different than the "official story").
- Who actually ran a service and their own personal history.
- How the service was structured behind the scenes. (For example, there was no "trading bot".)
- Details of what audits reported and how vulnerabilities were missed during auditing.
What Happened
The specific events of the loss and how it came about. What actually happened to cause the loss and some of the events leading up to it.
Date | Event | Description |
---|---|---|
May 17th, 2021 | Main Event | Expand this into a brief description of what happened and the impact. If multiple lines are necessary, add them here. |
Technical Details
This section includes specific detailed technical analysis of any security breaches which happened. What specific software vulnerabilities contributed to the problem and how were they exploited?
Total Amount Lost
The total amount lost has been estimated at $7,000,000 USD.
How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?
Immediate Reactions
How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?
Ultimate Outcome
What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?
Total Amount Recovered
There do not appear to have been any funds recovered in this case.
What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?
Ongoing Developments
What parts of this case are still remaining to be concluded?
General Prevention Policies
It should seem very obvious in hindsight that multi-signature is critical to prevent cases where one team member steals the funds and to hugely reduce the risk of breach. Keys should be stored offline and all operators should be trained on their proper use.
Individual Prevention Policies
No specific policies for individual prevention have yet been identified in this case.
For the full list of how to protect your funds as an individual, check our Prevention Policies for Individuals guide.
Platform Prevention Policies
Policies for platforms to take to prevent this situation have not yet been selected in this case.
For the full list of how to protect your funds as a financial service, check our Prevention Policies for Platforms guide.
Regulatory Prevention Policies
No specific regulatory policies have yet been identified in this case.
For the full list of regulatory policies that can prevent loss, check our Prevention Policies for Regulators guide.
References
- ↑ SlowMist Hacked - SlowMist Zone (May 18, 2021)
- ↑ Another Day Another DeFi Hack: FinNexus Protocol Exploited for $7.6M (May 19, 2021)
- ↑ FinNexus Homepage (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ About FinNexus (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ @fin_nexus Twitter (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ @fin_nexus Twitter (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ A New Start Finnexus Compensation And Security Enhancement Plan (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ Finnexus Statement Regarding The May 2021 Hack (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ Ethereum Transaction Hash (Txhash) Details | Etherscan (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ FinNexus Whitepaper (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ Latest DeFi Hack Drains $7.6M From FinNexus Options Protocol (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ @fin_nexus Twitter (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ @fin_nexus Twitter (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ @FrankResearcher Twitter (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ What is FinNexus? | Genesis Block (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ DeFi tool FinNexus (FNX) plunges by 90% after hack—some allege an inside job (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ FinNexus Contract Deployer Exploited, Sending Token in a -90% Spiral (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ Pdfs/PeckShield-Audit-FinnexusOptionsV1.0.pdf at master · FinNexus/Pdfs · GitHub (May 24, 2021)
- ↑ A New Start Finnexus Compensation And Security Enhancement Plan (Jun 26, 2021)
- ↑ CertiK Blockchain Security Leaderboard (Jun 1, 2021)