Vine Protocol Airdrop Scam

Notice: This page is a freshly imported case study from the original repository. The original content was in a different format, and may not have relevant information for all sections. Please help restructure the content by moving information from the 'About' section to other sections, and add any missing information or sources you can find. If you are new here, please read General Tutorial on Wikis or Anatomy of a Case Study for help getting started.

Notice: This page contains sources which are not attributed to any text. The unattributed sources follow the initial description. Please assist by visiting each source, reviewing the content, and placing that reference next to any text it can be used to support. Feel free to add any information that you come across which isn't present already. Sources which don't contain any relevant information can be removed. Broken links can be replaced with versions from the Internet Archive. See General Tutorial on Wikis, Anatomy of a Case Study, and/or Citing Your Sources Guide for additional information. Thanks for your help!

Vine Protocol

Vine Protocol created a nice whitepaper, website, and proposed to launch a new decentralized finance platform.

If you performed some steps, you were supposedly set up to receive 500 of the free VINE tokens.

However, when it came time to actually launch, they asked people to send 0.1BNB in order to receive the airdrop, while others were told they had to do 5 referrals.

It is unknown how many people were tricked into sending their funds.

This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.

About Vine Protocol

"The #1 AMM and yield farm on Binance Smart Chain."

"Vine Protocol is a multi-chain protocol for liquidity mining, market making, DeFi token offering and DEX aggregation. It provides all these services at zero cost to the users that have enabled transaction fee mining." "Vine Protocol is the next step forward in Dex Defi protocols, designed to be the next evolution. Taking Binance chain’s liquidity focused strategy."

"75.30% of Genesis Vine Protocol (VINE) resources are dedicated to members of the Vine Protocol community." "VINE will be available through four liquidity mining pools: VINE-BNB, VINE-ETH, VINE-USDT and VINE-WBTC."

"VINE Protocol is airdropping 500 VINE to airdrop participants." "Vine Protocol is launching a crypto Airdrop program to community. Join the Airdrop campaign and complete tasks, You will earn free 500 VINE Tokens with an estimate value of $250."

"Inbounds received that indicated as protention high risks regarding a project named Vine Protocol. The project claimed to have been audited by CertiK, which is misleading, and not true at all."

"Beware that Vine-Protocol has widely publicized a huge airdrop, that depended upon the word having been widely spread."

"Theoretically today was payday, to those who made the appropriate sharings, and referrals but right now they are presenting a very scammy strategy, claiming they couldnt send the promised tokens due to a smart chain problem asking people to instead send then 0.1bnb."

"I have no idea whether this is actually a legit aidrop, and I do not wish to spread any FUD but, anybody who asks you to send them crypto to send you crypto is, at best, shady, at worst straight scam."

"I signed up for the aidrop completing every step- sharing their tweet on my twitter and all. One of the steps was signing up to their telegram group - fine done. Weeks later - they posted in the telegram group that they had "forgotten" a step and needed everyone who they had already told was eligible for their airdrop to now get 5 referrals to be eligible."

This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.

The background of the exchange platform, service, or individuals involved, as it would have been seen or understood at the time of the events.

Include:

• Known history of when and how the service was started.
• What problems does the company or service claim to solve?
• What marketing materials were used by the firm or business?
• Audits performed, and excerpts that may have been included.
• Business registration documents shown (fake or legitimate).
• How were people recruited to participate?
• Public warnings and announcements prior to the event.

Don't Include:

• Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
• Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.

There could be more than one section here. If the same platform is involved with multiple incidents, then it can be linked to a main article page.

The Reality

This sections is included if a case involved deception or information that was unknown at the time. Examples include:

• When the service was actually started (if different than the "official story").
• Who actually ran a service and their own personal history.
• How the service was structured behind the scenes. (For example, there was no "trading bot".)
• Details of what audits reported and how vulnerabilities were missed during auditing.

What Happened

The specific events of the loss and how it came about. What actually happened to cause the loss and some of the events leading up to it.

Key Event Timeline - Vine Protocol Airdrop Scam

Date	Event	Description
April 30th, 2021 12:00:00 AM	Main Event	Expand this into a brief description of what happened and the impact. If multiple lines are necessary, add them here.

Total Amount Lost

The total amount lost is unknown.

How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?

Immediate Reactions

How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?

Ultimate Outcome

What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?

Total Amount Recovered

There do not appear to have been any funds recovered in this case.

What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?

Ongoing Developments

What parts of this case are still remaining to be concluded?

Prevention Policies

Which policies could have prevented this event from happening?