BitcoinTalk Database Breach: Difference between revisions

From Quadriga Initiative Cryptocurrency Hacks, Scams, and Frauds Repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Information in the about section spread out into other sections of the article. Added information from the articles by CCN and DataBreaches.net. DataBreaches.net replaced with archived version. Updated source titles of various sources.)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/bitcointalkdatabasebreach.php}}
{{Case Study Under Construction}}{{Unattributed Sources}}
{{Unattributed Sources}}


[[File:Bitcointalk.jpg|thumb|BitcoinTalk]]BitcoinTalk is one of the largest and oldest forums on the internet related to bitcoin. In May 2015, the server was compromised through a social engineering attack on the sites ISP (internet service provider). In the apparent 12 minutes that the attackers had access, they managed to pull the entire database of all 499,593 users. The stolen BitcoinTalk data includes usernames, email addresses, passwords, birthdates, secret questions, hashed secret answers and other pieces of data belonging to the platform. Luckily, passwords were securely hashed and the vast majority could not be efficiently brute forced.
[[File:Bitcointalk.jpg|thumb|BitcoinTalk]]BitcoinTalk is one of the largest and oldest forums on the internet related to bitcoin. In May 2015, the server was compromised through a social engineering attack on the sites ISP (internet service provider). In the apparent 12 minutes that the attackers had access, they managed to pull the entire database of all 499,593 users. The stolen BitcoinTalk data includes usernames, email addresses, passwords, birthdates, secret questions, hashed secret answers and other pieces of data belonging to the platform. Luckily, passwords were securely hashed and the vast majority could not be efficiently brute forced.


This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.<ref name="ccn-6817" /><ref name="databreaches-6818" /><ref name="newsbtc-6820" /><ref name="bitcoinwiki-6920" /><ref name="youtube-6921" /><ref name="coinpoint-6922" /><ref name="reddit-6923" /><ref name="bitcointalklegendaryprofiles-6924" /><ref name="coindesk-6925" /><ref name="nforce-6926" /><ref name="bitcointalktwitter-6927" /><ref name="reddit-6928" /><ref name="leakedsourcearchive-6929" />
This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.<ref name="newsbtc-6820" /><ref name="bitcoinwiki-6920" /><ref name="youtube-6921" /><ref name="coinpoint-6922" /><ref name="reddit-6923" /><ref name="bitcointalklegendaryprofiles-6924" /><ref name="coindesk-6925" /><ref name="nforce-6926" /><ref name="bitcointalktwitter-6927" /><ref name="reddit-6928" /><ref name="leakedsourcearchive-6929" /><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20161030093311/http://www.coindesk.com/bitcointalk-server-compromised/</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20161030093311/https://www.leakedsource.com/blog/bitcointalkbtce</ref><ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20160331235954/http://www.databreaches.net/server-compromised-due-to-social-engineering-against-isp-nforce/</ref>


== About BitcoinTalk ==
== About BitcoinTalk ==
Line 14: Line 13:


"In July, 2011 the forum was moved to bitcointalk.org in order to make it explicitly unofficial. The "forum" link on the bitcoin.org homepage was made to simply return the Google search results for the search terms "bitcoin forums". This was followed by Bitcoin Community members, very much in bitcoin's spirit of decentralisation, creating a number of alternative forums offering different moderatorial policies and using different software platforms. None of these alternative forums have yet reached the size of Bitcoin Talk." "On July 22, 2012, Bitcoin Talk reached its one millionth post."
"In July, 2011 the forum was moved to bitcointalk.org in order to make it explicitly unofficial. The "forum" link on the bitcoin.org homepage was made to simply return the Google search results for the search terms "bitcoin forums". This was followed by Bitcoin Community members, very much in bitcoin's spirit of decentralisation, creating a number of alternative forums offering different moderatorial policies and using different software platforms. None of these alternative forums have yet reached the size of Bitcoin Talk." "On July 22, 2012, Bitcoin Talk reached its one millionth post."
"In May 2015, BitcoinTalk was the victim of a social engineering attack after an unknown hacker targeted an employee of NFOrce, BitcoinTalk’s ISP. In a revelation on Reddit at the time, forum operator and admin Theymos hinted that password hashes, private messages, emails and other user details could be compromised."
"Bitcointalk.org had 499,593 users hacked in May of 2015, and they do know about the breach. Bitcointalk.org data contains usernames, emails, passwords, birthdays, secret questions, hashed secret answers and some other internal data." "The stolen BitcoinTalk data includes usernames, email addresses, passwords, birthdates, secret questions, hashed secret answers and other pieces of data belonging to the platform."
"The attack is said to have targeted the site's ISP, a company called NFOrce that is based in the Netherlands." "Server compromised due to social engineering against ISP NFOrce. There will be extended downtime for forensic analysis and reinstall."
"The forum's ISP NFOrce managed to get tricked into giving an attacker access to the server. I think that the attacker had access for only about 12 minutes before I noticed it and had the server disconnected, so he probably wasn't able to get a complete dump of the database."
"The compromise was announced via the official BitcoinTalk Twitter account. Operator Theymos later took to the bitcoin subreddit to offer a more detailed explanation."
"Theymos said that BitcoinTalk could remain offline for as many as 60 hours following the incident, and cautioned users to "act as though your password hashes, PMs, emails, etc. were compromised"."
"However, the account information gained by the hackers may not have come of much use to them due to additional protection features incorporated into these platforms." "Only 44,869 (9%) of users on Bitcointalk.org used MD5 hashing with a unique salt for passwords. Of those, LeakedSource.com was able to crack 30,389 or 68%. The remaining 91% of user passwords were hashed with “sha256crypt” and LeakedSource estimates it would take them about a year to crack an estimated 60-70% of them. This method of password storage is far superior to nearly every website they say they’ve seen thus far."
This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.
The background of the exchange platform, service, or individuals involved, as it would have been seen or understood at the time of the events.
Include:
* Known history of when and how the service was started.
* What problems does the company or service claim to solve?
* What marketing materials were used by the firm or business?
* Audits performed, and excerpts that may have been included.
* Business registration documents shown (fake or legitimate).
* How were people recruited to participate?
* Public warnings and announcements prior to the event.
Don't Include:
* Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
* Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.
There could be more than one section here. If the same platform is involved with multiple incidents, then it can be linked to a main article page.


== The Reality ==
== The Reality ==
This sections is included if a case involved deception or information that was unknown at the time. Examples include:
Any third party website may be breached and information stored there would be compromised in such a breach. The BitcoinTalk database was an attractive target with 499,593 users<ref name="ccn-6817" />.


* When the service was actually started (if different than the "official story").
A small number of user accounts were hashed using the outdated MD5 method<ref name="ccn-6817" />. A "minority of 9%, or 44,869 users’ accounts used MD5 hashing with a unique salt for an added layer of security"<ref name="ccn-6817" />.<blockquote>Stored data contains all manners of user details including usernames, email addresses, passwords, IP addresses, dates of registration, and the user’s preferred language. Somewhat alarmingly, some profile details even revealed the number of bitcoins owned by the user.</blockquote>
* Who actually ran a service and their own personal history.
* How the service was structured behind the scenes. (For example, there was no "trading bot".)
* Details of what audits reported and how vulnerabilities were missed during auditing.


== What Happened ==
== What Happened ==
The specific events of the loss and how it came about. What actually happened to cause the loss and some of the events leading up to it.
Through socially engineering BitcoinTalk's internet service provider, an attacker was able to gain access to the database of BitcoinTalk user information.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+Key Event Timeline - BitcoinTalk Database Breach
|+Key Event Timeline - BitcoinTalk Database Breach
Line 66: Line 29:
|May 21st, 2015 7:14:00 PM MDT
|May 21st, 2015 7:14:00 PM MDT
|Main Event
|Main Event
|Expand this into a brief description of what happened and the impact. If multiple lines are necessary, add them here.
|"In May 2015, BitcoinTalk was the victim of a social engineering attack after an unknown hacker targeted an employee of NFOrce, BitcoinTalk’s ISP. In a revelation on Reddit at the time, forum operator and admin Theymos hinted that password hashes, private messages, emails and other user details could be compromised."
|-
|-
|
|September 2nd, 2016 3:25:58 AM MDT
|
|CCN Article Mention
|
|The breach is mentioned in a CCN article with details of cyberattacks resulting in breaches of user data from two prominent bitcoin websites, BTC-e exchange, and Bitcointalk.org forum, have been revealed by data breach monitoring resource LeakedSource<ref name="ccn-6817" />. BitcoinTalk.org saw stolen information from 499,593 users, with a small percentage using MD5 hashing and the majority utilizing the "sha256crypt" method, praised as superior in password storage security<ref name="ccn-6817" />. LeakedSource noted the difficulty in cracking these passwords, highlighting the effectiveness of BitcoinTalk's security measures<ref name="ccn-6817" />.
|-
|September 2nd, 2016 7:02:05 AM MDT
|DataBreaches.net Article Posted
|DataBreaches.net reports that two Bitcoin-related websites, Btc-E.com and Bitcointalk.org, were hacked in October 2014 and May 2015, respectively<ref name="databreaches-6818" /><ref name=":0">[https://web.archive.org/web/20240119051218/https://databreaches.net/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-and-bitcointalk-forum-breaches/ Bitcoin Exchange BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Forum Breaches - DataBreaches.net Archive January 18th, 2024 10:12:18 PM MST] (Accessed Apr 2, 2024)</ref>. Btc-E.com had 568,355 users' data compromised, including usernames, emails, passwords, IP addresses, registration dates, and internal data. Their password hashing method remains uncrackable, enhancing security against potential Bitcoin theft. Bitcointalk.org, with 499,593 users affected, saw varying password hashing methods, with 9% using MD5 hashing and the majority utilizing "sha256crypt," deemed superior in security by LeakedSource.com. Cracking sha256crypt passwords would take a year, highlighting the robustness of Bitcointalk.org's security measures<ref name="databreaches-6818" /><ref name=":0">[https://web.archive.org/web/20240119051218/https://databreaches.net/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-and-bitcointalk-forum-breaches/ Bitcoin Exchange BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Forum Breaches - DataBreaches.net Archive January 18th, 2024 10:12:18 PM MST] (Accessed Apr 2, 2024)</ref>.
|}
|}
== Technical Details ==
"In May 2015, BitcoinTalk was the victim of a social engineering attack after an unknown hacker targeted an employee of NFOrce, BitcoinTalk’s ISP. In a revelation on Reddit at the time, forum operator and admin Theymos hinted that password hashes, private messages, emails and other user details could be compromised."
"Bitcointalk.org had 499,593 users hacked in May of 2015, and they do know about the breach. Bitcointalk.org data contains usernames, emails, passwords, birthdays, secret questions, hashed secret answers and some other internal data." "The stolen BitcoinTalk data includes usernames, email addresses, passwords, birthdates, secret questions, hashed secret answers and other pieces of data belonging to the platform."
"The attack is said to have targeted the site's ISP, a company called NFOrce that is based in the Netherlands." "Server compromised due to social engineering against ISP NFOrce. There will be extended downtime for forensic analysis and reinstall."
"The forum's ISP NFOrce managed to get tricked into giving an attacker access to the server. I think that the attacker had access for only about 12 minutes before I noticed it and had the server disconnected, so he probably wasn't able to get a complete dump of the database."
=== Password Crackability ===
<ref name="ccn-6817" /><blockquote>"Notably, the remaining 91% of user passwords were hashed with “sha256crypt”, a method of password storage that LeakedSource deemed as “far superior to nearly every website we’ve seen thus far.” That’s high praise, coming from a resource that reveals details of data breaches frequently, in a time where mega-breaches of hundreds of millions of users are commonplace."</blockquote>


== Total Amount Lost ==
== Total Amount Lost ==
Line 80: Line 59:
== Immediate Reactions ==
== Immediate Reactions ==
How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?
How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?
"The compromise was announced via the official BitcoinTalk Twitter account. Operator Theymos later took to the bitcoin subreddit to offer a more detailed explanation."
"Theymos said that BitcoinTalk could remain offline for as many as 60 hours following the incident, and cautioned users to "act as though your password hashes, PMs, emails, etc. were compromised"."


== Ultimate Outcome ==
== Ultimate Outcome ==
What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?
What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?
"However, the account information gained by the hackers may not have come of much use to them due to additional protection features incorporated into these platforms." "Only 44,869 (9%) of users on Bitcointalk.org used MD5 hashing with a unique salt for passwords. Of those, LeakedSource.com was able to crack 30,389 or 68%. The remaining 91% of user passwords were hashed with “sha256crypt” and LeakedSource estimates it would take them about a year to crack an estimated 60-70% of them. This method of password storage is far superior to nearly every website they say they’ve seen thus far."


== Total Amount Recovered ==
== Total Amount Recovered ==
Line 107: Line 92:


== References ==
== References ==
<references><ref name="ccn-6817">[https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-bitcointalk-forum-breaches-details-revealed/ https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-bitcointalk-forum-breaches-details-revealed/] (Mar 4, 2022)</ref>
<references>
 
<ref name="ccn-6817">[https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-bitcointalk-forum-breaches-details-revealed/ Bitcoin Exchange BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Forum Breaches’ Details Revealed - CCN] (Accessed Mar 4, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="databreaches-6818">[https://www.databreaches.net/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-and-bitcointalk-forum-breaches/ https://www.databreaches.net/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-and-bitcointalk-forum-breaches/] (Mar 4, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="databreaches-6818">[https://web.archive.org/web/20161030093311/https://databreaches.net/bitcoin-exchange-btc-e-and-bitcointalk-forum-breaches/ Bitcoin Exchange BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Forum Breaches - DataBreaches.net Archive October 30th, 2016 3:33:11 AM MDT] (Accessed Mar 4, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="newsbtc-6820">[https://www.newsbtc.com/news/leakedsource-publishes-update-btc-e-bitcointalk-hacking-incidents/ Update on BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Hacking Incidents - NewsBTC] (Mar 4, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="newsbtc-6820">[https://www.newsbtc.com/news/leakedsource-publishes-update-btc-e-bitcointalk-hacking-incidents/ Update on BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Hacking Incidents] (Mar 4, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="bitcoinwiki-6920">[https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Talk Bitcoin Talk - BitcoinWiki] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="youtube-6921">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETh4KgKTyHs Bitcoin Weekly Show - Introduction to BitcoinTalk.org - YouTube] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="bitcoinwiki-6920">[https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Talk Bitcoin Talk. All about cryptocurrency - BitcoinWiki] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="coinpoint-6922">[https://www.coinpoint.net/partners/bitcointalk/ BitcoinTalk - CoinPoint - The Premium Digital Marketing Agency] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="reddit-6923">[https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/8j3tkq/collection_of_legendary_bitcoin_talk_posts_from/ Collection of legendary Bitcoin Talk posts. From the first post made by Satoshi Nakamoto to the inventor of HODL, faucets offering 5BTC per user, a guy that bought 250k+ Bitcoins for less than $3k and more. - Reddit] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="youtube-6921">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETh4KgKTyHs Introduction to BitcoinTalk.org | Bitcoin Weekly Show - YouTube] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="bitcointalklegendaryprofiles-6924">[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3247239.0 Legendary profiles of bitcointalk. - BitcoinTalk] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="coindesk-6925">[https://www.coindesk.com/business/2015/05/22/bitcointalk-server-compromised-during-social-engineering-attack/ BitcoinTalk Server Compromised During Social Engineering Attack - CoinDesk] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="coinpoint-6922">[https://www.coinpoint.net/partners/bitcointalk/ Bitcointalk - CoinPoint - The Premium Digital Marketing Agency] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="nforce-6926">https://www.nforce.com/ (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="reddit-6923">[https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/8j3tkq/collection_of_legendary_bitcoin_talk_posts_from/ Reddit - Dive into anything] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="bitcointalklegendaryprofiles-6924">[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3247239.0 Legendary profiles of bitcointalk.] (Mar 7, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="coindesk-6925">[https://www.coindesk.com/business/2015/05/22/bitcointalk-server-compromised-during-social-engineering-attack/ BitcoinTalk Server Compromised During Social Engineering Attack] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="nforce-6926">[https://www.nforce.com/ https://www.nforce.com/] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="bitcointalktwitter-6927">[https://twitter.com/bitcointalk/status/601556710130515969 @bitcointalk Twitter] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="bitcointalktwitter-6927">[https://twitter.com/bitcointalk/status/601556710130515969 @bitcointalk Twitter] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="reddit-6928">[https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/36tqq4/bitcointalk_server_compromised_due_to_social/crh0swt/ Reddit - Dive into anything] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="reddit-6928">[https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/36tqq4/bitcointalk_server_compromised_due_to_social/crh0swt/ Reddit - Dive into anything] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
 
<ref name="leakedsourcearchive-6929">[https://web.archive.org/web/20161208010408/https://www.leakedsource.com/blog/bitcointalkbtce LeakedSource disclosure of Bitcointalk.org and Btc-e.com Hack] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref>
<ref name="leakedsourcearchive-6929">[https://web.archive.org/web/20161208010408/https://www.leakedsource.com/blog/bitcointalkbtce LeakedSource disclosure of Bitcointalk.org and Btc-e.com Hack] (Mar 8, 2022)</ref></references>
</references>

Revision as of 16:40, 2 April 2024

Notice: This page is a new case study and some aspects have not been fully researched. Some sections may be incomplete or reflect inaccuracies present in initial sources. Please check the References at the bottom for further information and perform your own additional assessment. Please feel free to contribute by adding any missing information or sources you come across. If you are new here, please read General Tutorial on Wikis or Anatomy of a Case Study for help getting started.

Notice: This page contains sources which are not attributed to any text. The unattributed sources follow the initial description. Please assist by visiting each source, reviewing the content, and placing that reference next to any text it can be used to support. Feel free to add any information that you come across which isn't present already. Sources which don't contain any relevant information can be removed. Broken links can be replaced with versions from the Internet Archive. See General Tutorial on Wikis, Anatomy of a Case Study, and/or Citing Your Sources Guide for additional information. Thanks for your help!

BitcoinTalk

BitcoinTalk is one of the largest and oldest forums on the internet related to bitcoin. In May 2015, the server was compromised through a social engineering attack on the sites ISP (internet service provider). In the apparent 12 minutes that the attackers had access, they managed to pull the entire database of all 499,593 users. The stolen BitcoinTalk data includes usernames, email addresses, passwords, birthdates, secret questions, hashed secret answers and other pieces of data belonging to the platform. Luckily, passwords were securely hashed and the vast majority could not be efficiently brute forced.

This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]

About BitcoinTalk

BitcoinTalk is "one of the largest and, most importantly, international forums where you can find absolutely all the information about Bitcoins." "Bitcointalk.org is the largest and probably the most famous forum related to the Bitcoin world." "Here you can safely communicate with miners from different parts of the world, read about the most favorable offers from cranes or cloud mining sites, learn the principles of doubling and choose the most reliable services, communicate in "non-stop"mode."

"BitcoinTalk is a message board where people interested in the technical details and the development of Bitcoin software can talk to each other. The forum also has places for people who are interested in bitcoin mining, in trading with bitcoin, and in the economics of Bitcoin."

"Before the creation of the current BitcoinTalk Forum, Satoshi used a SourceForge forum, which is lost. When Sirius provided hosting, the forum was moved to bitcoin.org/smf. Satoshi made several custom modifications to the forum software and theme."

"In July, 2011 the forum was moved to bitcointalk.org in order to make it explicitly unofficial. The "forum" link on the bitcoin.org homepage was made to simply return the Google search results for the search terms "bitcoin forums". This was followed by Bitcoin Community members, very much in bitcoin's spirit of decentralisation, creating a number of alternative forums offering different moderatorial policies and using different software platforms. None of these alternative forums have yet reached the size of Bitcoin Talk." "On July 22, 2012, Bitcoin Talk reached its one millionth post."

The Reality

Any third party website may be breached and information stored there would be compromised in such a breach. The BitcoinTalk database was an attractive target with 499,593 users[15].

A small number of user accounts were hashed using the outdated MD5 method[15]. A "minority of 9%, or 44,869 users’ accounts used MD5 hashing with a unique salt for an added layer of security"[15].

Stored data contains all manners of user details including usernames, email addresses, passwords, IP addresses, dates of registration, and the user’s preferred language. Somewhat alarmingly, some profile details even revealed the number of bitcoins owned by the user.

What Happened

Through socially engineering BitcoinTalk's internet service provider, an attacker was able to gain access to the database of BitcoinTalk user information.

Key Event Timeline - BitcoinTalk Database Breach
Date Event Description
May 21st, 2015 7:14:00 PM MDT Main Event "In May 2015, BitcoinTalk was the victim of a social engineering attack after an unknown hacker targeted an employee of NFOrce, BitcoinTalk’s ISP. In a revelation on Reddit at the time, forum operator and admin Theymos hinted that password hashes, private messages, emails and other user details could be compromised."
September 2nd, 2016 3:25:58 AM MDT CCN Article Mention The breach is mentioned in a CCN article with details of cyberattacks resulting in breaches of user data from two prominent bitcoin websites, BTC-e exchange, and Bitcointalk.org forum, have been revealed by data breach monitoring resource LeakedSource[15]. BitcoinTalk.org saw stolen information from 499,593 users, with a small percentage using MD5 hashing and the majority utilizing the "sha256crypt" method, praised as superior in password storage security[15]. LeakedSource noted the difficulty in cracking these passwords, highlighting the effectiveness of BitcoinTalk's security measures[15].
September 2nd, 2016 7:02:05 AM MDT DataBreaches.net Article Posted DataBreaches.net reports that two Bitcoin-related websites, Btc-E.com and Bitcointalk.org, were hacked in October 2014 and May 2015, respectively[16][17]. Btc-E.com had 568,355 users' data compromised, including usernames, emails, passwords, IP addresses, registration dates, and internal data. Their password hashing method remains uncrackable, enhancing security against potential Bitcoin theft. Bitcointalk.org, with 499,593 users affected, saw varying password hashing methods, with 9% using MD5 hashing and the majority utilizing "sha256crypt," deemed superior in security by LeakedSource.com. Cracking sha256crypt passwords would take a year, highlighting the robustness of Bitcointalk.org's security measures[16][17].

Technical Details

"In May 2015, BitcoinTalk was the victim of a social engineering attack after an unknown hacker targeted an employee of NFOrce, BitcoinTalk’s ISP. In a revelation on Reddit at the time, forum operator and admin Theymos hinted that password hashes, private messages, emails and other user details could be compromised."

"Bitcointalk.org had 499,593 users hacked in May of 2015, and they do know about the breach. Bitcointalk.org data contains usernames, emails, passwords, birthdays, secret questions, hashed secret answers and some other internal data." "The stolen BitcoinTalk data includes usernames, email addresses, passwords, birthdates, secret questions, hashed secret answers and other pieces of data belonging to the platform."

"The attack is said to have targeted the site's ISP, a company called NFOrce that is based in the Netherlands." "Server compromised due to social engineering against ISP NFOrce. There will be extended downtime for forensic analysis and reinstall."

"The forum's ISP NFOrce managed to get tricked into giving an attacker access to the server. I think that the attacker had access for only about 12 minutes before I noticed it and had the server disconnected, so he probably wasn't able to get a complete dump of the database."

Password Crackability

[15]

"Notably, the remaining 91% of user passwords were hashed with “sha256crypt”, a method of password storage that LeakedSource deemed as “far superior to nearly every website we’ve seen thus far.” That’s high praise, coming from a resource that reveals details of data breaches frequently, in a time where mega-breaches of hundreds of millions of users are commonplace."

Total Amount Lost

No funds were lost.

How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?

Immediate Reactions

How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?

"The compromise was announced via the official BitcoinTalk Twitter account. Operator Theymos later took to the bitcoin subreddit to offer a more detailed explanation."

"Theymos said that BitcoinTalk could remain offline for as many as 60 hours following the incident, and cautioned users to "act as though your password hashes, PMs, emails, etc. were compromised"."

Ultimate Outcome

What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?

"However, the account information gained by the hackers may not have come of much use to them due to additional protection features incorporated into these platforms." "Only 44,869 (9%) of users on Bitcointalk.org used MD5 hashing with a unique salt for passwords. Of those, LeakedSource.com was able to crack 30,389 or 68%. The remaining 91% of user passwords were hashed with “sha256crypt” and LeakedSource estimates it would take them about a year to crack an estimated 60-70% of them. This method of password storage is far superior to nearly every website they say they’ve seen thus far."

Total Amount Recovered

There do not appear to have been any funds recovered in this case.

What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?

Ongoing Developments

What parts of this case are still remaining to be concluded?

Individual Prevention Policies

No specific policies for individual prevention have yet been identified in this case.

For the full list of how to protect your funds as an individual, check our Prevention Policies for Individuals guide.

Platform Prevention Policies

Policies for platforms to take to prevent this situation have not yet been selected in this case.

For the full list of how to protect your funds as a financial service, check our Prevention Policies for Platforms guide.

Regulatory Prevention Policies

No specific regulatory policies have yet been identified in this case.

For the full list of regulatory policies that can prevent loss, check our Prevention Policies for Regulators guide.

References

  1. ↑ Update on BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Hacking Incidents - NewsBTC (Mar 4, 2022)
  2. ↑ Bitcoin Talk - BitcoinWiki (Mar 7, 2022)
  3. ↑ Bitcoin Weekly Show - Introduction to BitcoinTalk.org - YouTube (Mar 7, 2022)
  4. ↑ BitcoinTalk - CoinPoint - The Premium Digital Marketing Agency (Mar 7, 2022)
  5. ↑ Collection of legendary Bitcoin Talk posts. From the first post made by Satoshi Nakamoto to the inventor of HODL, faucets offering 5BTC per user, a guy that bought 250k+ Bitcoins for less than $3k and more. - Reddit (Mar 7, 2022)
  6. ↑ Legendary profiles of bitcointalk. - BitcoinTalk (Mar 7, 2022)
  7. ↑ BitcoinTalk Server Compromised During Social Engineering Attack - CoinDesk (Mar 8, 2022)
  8. ↑ https://www.nforce.com/ (Mar 8, 2022)
  9. ↑ @bitcointalk Twitter (Mar 8, 2022)
  10. ↑ Reddit - Dive into anything (Mar 8, 2022)
  11. ↑ LeakedSource disclosure of Bitcointalk.org and Btc-e.com Hack (Mar 8, 2022)
  12. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20161030093311/http://www.coindesk.com/bitcointalk-server-compromised/
  13. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20161030093311/https://www.leakedsource.com/blog/bitcointalkbtce
  14. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20160331235954/http://www.databreaches.net/server-compromised-due-to-social-engineering-against-isp-nforce/
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 Bitcoin Exchange BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Forum Breaches’ Details Revealed - CCN (Accessed Mar 4, 2022)
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 Bitcoin Exchange BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Forum Breaches - DataBreaches.net Archive October 30th, 2016 3:33:11 AM MDT (Accessed Mar 4, 2022)
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Bitcoin Exchange BTC-E and BitcoinTalk Forum Breaches - DataBreaches.net Archive January 18th, 2024 10:12:18 PM MST (Accessed Apr 2, 2024)
Retrieved from "https://quadrigainitiative.com/cryptocurrencyhackscamfraudwiki/index.php?title=BitcoinTalk_Database_Breach&oldid=5604"