Tsim Sha Tsui Businessmen Robbed

Notice: This page is a freshly imported case study from the original repository. The original content was in a different format, and may not have relevant information for all sections. Please help restructure the content by moving information from the 'About' and 'General Prevention' sections to other sections, and add any missing information or sources you can find. If you are new here, please read General Tutorial on Wikis or Anatomy of a Case Study for help getting started.

None

In Tsim Sha Tsui, a region of Hong Kong, a group of business-people were tricked out of $1.5m HKD (~$191k USD). They had previously transacted with the trader for an even larger sum without issue. They were led to a room which was full of fake equipment and made their transfer. The trader then locked the front door and headed into the other room, pretending to talk to others in the room to prepare the funds but instead leaving through a back entrance. Police were called and ultimately managed to apprehend the suspect. It is unclear if any of the funds were recovered.

About Chungking Mansions Exchange Shop

"A male businessman surnamed Choi (30 years old) who owns a company in Tsim Sha Tsui specialising in crypto currency trading, brought his male staff member (30 years old) and a female staff member surnamed Cheng (26 years old) to a crypto currency exchange shop in Chungking Mansions to trade Tether coins with a male buyer."

"At 1.11pm, the police received a report from a woman who said that she and her employer had met a buyer in “Super Coin” crypto currency exchange shop to trade bitcoins in the Chungking Mansions shopping mall, No. 36 to 44 Nathan Road earlier."

"It is understood that the female staff had previously traded virtual currency with the scammer, and today’s transaction was only possible due to the successful completion of the previous transaction. The two parties originally traded Tether coins worth about 4.5 million Hong Kong dollars, but this round Choi first transferred the Tether coins worth about 1.5 million Hong Kong dollars to the buyer’s account, and the whole transaction was completed before the other party paid the full amount."

Include:

• Known history of when and how the service was started.
• What problems does the company or service claim to solve?
• What marketing materials were used by the firm or business?
• Audits performed, and excerpts that may have been included.
• Business registration documents shown (fake or legitimate).
• How were people recruited to participate?
• Public warnings and announcements prior to the event.

Don't Include:

• Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
• Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.

There could be more than one section here. If the same platform is involved with multiple incidents, then it can be linked to a main article page.

The Reality

This sections is included if a case involved deception or information that was unknown at the time. Examples include:

• When the service was actually started (if different than the "official story").
• Who actually ran a service and their own personal history.
• How the service was structured behind the scenes. (For example, there was no "trading bot".)
• Details of what audits reported and how vulnerabilities were missed during auditing.

"The suspect allegedly lured the victim and two colleagues into the meeting room of a shop in Tsim Sha Tsui." "The virtual currency exchange shop involved has been in business for about a month, and there was a money counter and a tablet computer with no information left in the store." "Tong said the trading location was leased by a shell company for HK$4,000 (US$509) per month in April."

"The shop’s cash register was not connected to a power outlet and the “computer” was an empty box." “Inside the shop, the banknote counter was not connected to electricity. What looked like computers were just empty cases,” said Inspector Tong Sin-tung of the Yau Tsim criminal investigation unit on Wednesday."

What Happened

The specific events of the loss and how it came about. What actually happened to cause the loss and some of the events leading up to it.

"[T]he victim transferred $HK1.5M (US$191,085) to an e-wallet." "The buyer later showed up, obtained the relevant virtual currency transaction link from the three people, and falsely claimed to go to the staff room of the exchange to get cash payment. He then locked the glass front door of the shop before entering the staff room."

"It is believed that someone deliberately committed the crime." "The suspect then exited the premises under the pretense that he would get cash for the victim." "The scammer claimed that when he entered the staff room to get money, he shouted “Please prepare cash in HK$1,000 banknotes!” pretending that there were other people in the staff room in order to reduce the victims’ suspicion."

"After the victim transferred the crypto to the suspect’s wallet, the suspect fled through a side door and locked the victim inside." "He falsely claimed that he needed to go to withdraw money, locked the victims in the shop and left the scene. The victims later realised that they had been deceived, and found that more than HK$1.5 million worth of crypto coins in their account had been transferred away so one of the staff members immediately called the police for help."

"The victim and her colleagues then discovered they were locked in and called the police, who tracked down the victim on Tuesday in Sham Shui Po in northern Kowloon."

Key Event Timeline - Tsim Sha Tsui Businessmen Robbed

Date	Event	Description
May 3rd, 2022 11:11:00 PM MDT	Police Report Officially Received	The police officially receive the the report about the crime.
May 4th, 2022 12:53:00 AM MDT	DimSumDaily Article Published	The story is first picked up by Dimsum Daily, and international online English news blog.
May 10th, 2022 11:58:00 PM MDT	Hong Kong Police Post Video	Hong Kong Police posted a video where they address media about the incident.
May 11th, 2022 1:00:00 PM MDT	BeInCrypto Article Published	BeInCrypto publishes their article covering the events. This is copied to cryptocurrency news aggregator CryptoNews and copied with minor modifications by CryptoSaurus. While the article mentions being updated, the sections related to this event were unchanged.
May 11th, 2022 10:24:00 PM MDT	Forkast Reports Suspect Arrested	Asian news outlet Forkast reports that the suspect was successfully arrested.

Total Amount Lost

The total amount lost has been estimated at $191,000 USD.

How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?

Immediate Reactions

How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?

"Police officers blocked the currency exchange shop involved in the case, and checked the CCTV footage of the entrance and exit of the mall to track down the whereabouts of the suspect involved. The case is temporarily handed over to the Yau Tsim Police District Criminal Investigation Team for follow-up."

"Hong Kong police announced on Tuesday the arrest of a 24-year-old who is suspected of stealing HK$1.5 million (US$191,076) in cryptocurrencies in a physical cash-to-crypto transaction." "The police labeled the rare on-site cryptocurrency theft as a serious crime punishable by 10 years in prison, if convicted." "[The] 24-year-old man was arrested by Hong Kong police Tuesday for allegedly stealing [the] funds from a Hong Kong citizen, an offense punishable by up to ten years in prison."

Ultimate Outcome

What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?

"Hong Kong police spokeswoman Tong Sin-tung said at a Wednesday press conference the suspect had a face-to-face cryptocurrency transaction with the victim at a business located in tourist hub Tsim Sha Tsui on May 4. "

"The police have not recovered any money but seized some of the suspect’s personal effects from the bogus shop, which had been rented under the name of a shell company."

"Tong said the police are seeking to determine if the suspect was working alone, adding that the ongoing investigation could result in further arrests."

Total Amount Recovered

The total amount recovered is unknown.

Ongoing Developments

What parts of this case are still remaining to be concluded?

General Prevention Policies

The simplest way to avoid this situation is to be sure that you have physical visibility of the cash prior to authorizing any irreversible payment. Performing transactions in multiple stages or using an escrow agent to temporarily hold the funds can further the safety of such transactions.

Individual Prevention Policies

No specific policies for individual prevention have yet been identified in this case.

For the full list of how to protect your funds as an individual, check our Prevention Policies for Individuals guide.

Platform Prevention Policies

Policies for platforms to take to prevent this situation have not yet been selected in this case.

For the full list of how to protect your funds as a financial service, check our Prevention Policies for Platforms guide.

Regulatory Prevention Policies

No specific regulatory policies have yet been identified in this case.

For the full list of regulatory policies that can prevent loss, check our Prevention Policies for Regulators guide.