Ledger Funds Stolen Jpeezy555: Difference between revisions

From Quadriga Initiative Cryptocurrency Hacks, Scams, and Frauds Repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/ledgerfundsstolenjpeezy555.php}} thumb|LedgerTwitter user Jpeezy555 reports that the assets on the Ledger were taken, despite the wallet and seed phrase being held separately. One in a locked drawer and the other in a safe. Funds were sent to Binance. JPeezy555 reportedly engaged law enforcement, but as of an update almost a month later, there was no progress in recovery. The...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/ledgerfundsstolenjpeezy555.php}}
{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/ledgerfundsstolenjpeezy555.php}}
{{Unattributed Citations}}


[[File:Ledger.jpg|thumb|Ledger]]Twitter user Jpeezy555 reports that the assets on the Ledger were taken, despite the wallet and seed phrase being held separately. One in a locked drawer and the other in a safe. Funds were sent to Binance. JPeezy555  reportedly engaged law enforcement, but as of an update almost a month later, there was no progress in recovery.
[[File:Ledger.jpg|thumb|Ledger]]Twitter user Jpeezy555 reports that the assets on the Ledger were taken, despite the wallet and seed phrase being held separately. One in a locked drawer and the other in a safe. Funds were sent to Binance. JPeezy555  reportedly engaged law enforcement, but as of an update almost a month later, there was no progress in recovery.


The country for this case study is not yet known.
The country for this case study is not yet known.
<ref name="jpeezy555twitter-7706" /><ref name="jpeezy555twitter-7707" /><ref name="coinmarketcap-623" /><ref name="coinmarketcapeth-4651" /><ref name="coinmarketcap-6787" /><ref name="ledger-6398" /><ref name="financegates-7300" /><ref name="slashdot-7301" /><ref name="pcmag-6879" />


== About Ledger ==
== About Ledger ==
Line 33: Line 35:


Don't Include:
Don't Include:
* Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
* Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
* Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.
* Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.
Line 55: Line 56:
|-
|-
|May 11th, 2019 3:27:00 AM
|May 11th, 2019 3:27:00 AM
|First Event
|Main Event
|This is an expanded description of what happened and the impact. If multiple lines are necessary, add them here.
|Expand this into a brief description of what happened and the impact. If multiple lines are necessary, add them here.
|-
|
|
|
|-
|-
|
|
Line 68: Line 65:


== Total Amount Lost ==
== Total Amount Lost ==
The total amount lost is unknown.
The total amount lost has been estimated at $47,000 USD.


How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?
How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?
Line 79: Line 76:


== Total Amount Recovered ==
== Total Amount Recovered ==
It is unknown how much was recovered.
There do not appear to have been any funds recovered in this case.


What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?
What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?
Line 87: Line 84:


== Prevention Policies ==
== Prevention Policies ==
 
Which policies could have prevented this event from happening?


== References ==
== References ==
[https://twitter.com/jpeezy555/status/1127143122268561408 @jpeezy555 Twitter] (Mar 26)
<references><ref name="jpeezy555twitter-7706">[https://twitter.com/jpeezy555/status/1127143122268561408 @jpeezy555 Twitter] (Mar 26, 2022)</ref>


[https://twitter.com/jpeezy555/status/1135569353267695616 @jpeezy555 Twitter] (May 16)
<ref name="jpeezy555twitter-7707">[https://twitter.com/jpeezy555/status/1135569353267695616 @jpeezy555 Twitter] (May 16, 2022)</ref>


[https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/historical-data/ Bitcoin price today, BTC live marketcap, chart, and info | CoinMarketCap] (May 15)
<ref name="coinmarketcap-623">[https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/historical-data/ Bitcoin price today, BTC live marketcap, chart, and info | CoinMarketCap] (May 15, 2021)</ref>


[https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/historical-data/ https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/historical-data/] (Dec 20)
<ref name="coinmarketcapeth-4651">[https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/historical-data/ https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/ethereum/historical-data/] (Dec 20, 2021)</ref>


[https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/historical-data/ https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/historical-data/] (Mar 1)
<ref name="coinmarketcap-6787">[https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/historical-data/ https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/litecoin/historical-data/] (Mar 1, 2022)</ref>


[https://www.ledger.com/ledger-live Ledger Live : Most trusted & secure crypto wallet | Ledger] (Feb 13)
<ref name="ledger-6398">[https://www.ledger.com/ledger-live Ledger Live : Most trusted & secure crypto wallet | Ledger] (Feb 13, 2022)</ref>


[https://www.financegates.net/2020/12/23/ledger-refuses-refunds-tells-clients-bank-vault-is-more-secure/ Ledger Refuses Refunds, Tells Clients “Bank Vault Is More Secure” | Financegates] (Mar 19)
<ref name="financegates-7300">[https://www.financegates.net/2020/12/23/ledger-refuses-refunds-tells-clients-bank-vault-is-more-secure/ Ledger Refuses Refunds, Tells Clients “Bank Vault Is More Secure” | Financegates] (Mar 19, 2022)</ref>


[https://it.slashdot.org/story/20/12/21/2139218/physical-addresses-of-270k-ledger-owners-leaked-on-hacker-forum Physical Addresses of 270K Ledger Owners Leaked On Hacker Forum - Slashdot] (Mar 19)
<ref name="slashdot-7301">[https://it.slashdot.org/story/20/12/21/2139218/physical-addresses-of-270k-ledger-owners-leaked-on-hacker-forum Physical Addresses of 270K Ledger Owners Leaked On Hacker Forum - Slashdot] (Mar 19, 2022)</ref>


[https://www.pcmag.com/news/scammers-are-using-fake-devices-to-steal-cryptocurrency-wallets Scammers Are Using Fake Devices to Steal Cryptocurrency Wallets | PCMag] (Mar 6)
<ref name="pcmag-6879">[https://www.pcmag.com/news/scammers-are-using-fake-devices-to-steal-cryptocurrency-wallets Scammers Are Using Fake Devices to Steal Cryptocurrency Wallets | PCMag] (Mar 6, 2022)</ref></references>

Revision as of 02:06, 17 February 2023

Notice: This page is a freshly imported case study from the original repository. The original content was in a different format, and may not have relevant information for all sections. Please help restructure the content by moving information from the 'About' section to other sections, and add any missing information or sources you can find. If you are new here, please read General Tutorial on Wikis or Anatomy of a Case Study for help getting started.

Notice: This page contains sources which are not attributed to any text. The unattributed sources follow the initial description. Please assist by visiting each source, reviewing the content, and placing that reference next to any text it can be used to support. Feel free to add any information that you come across which isn't present already. Sources which don't contain any relevant information can be removed. Broken links can be replaced with versions from the Internet Archive. See General Tutorial on Wikis, Anatomy of a Case Study, and/or Citing Your Sources Guide for additional information. Thanks for your help!

Ledger

Twitter user Jpeezy555 reports that the assets on the Ledger were taken, despite the wallet and seed phrase being held separately. One in a locked drawer and the other in a safe. Funds were sent to Binance. JPeezy555 reportedly engaged law enforcement, but as of an update almost a month later, there was no progress in recovery.

The country for this case study is not yet known. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

About Ledger

"Based in France, Ledger is the largest cryptocurrency hardware wallet company." "Ledger is a hardware cryptocurrency wallet that is used to store, manage, and sell cryptocurrency. The funds held in these wallets are secured using a 24-word recovery phrase and an optional secret passphrase that only the owner knows."

"Ledger offers two products, the Nano S and Nano X, that can store the digital keys used to secure crypto wallets. The devices can be used with a variety of cryptocurrencies, are compatible with numerous apps, and are supposed to offer a safe way to manage crypto without compromising too much on convenience. Ledger says on its website that it has sold 1.5 million products to customers in 165 countries to date."

"[B]ought direct from ledger over 18 months ago." "It[ ha]s not left my home safe for the last few months." "[B]oth [seed phrase and ledger] kept separate, 1 in a locked drawer and the other in my safe."

"Horrible feeling this morning." "I've just checked my ledger nano s for the first time in a while and it's been cleaned out, totally stripped of everything." Lost "1.2btc 35eth 350ltc" "[A]pparently btc and Eth have ended up on @binance"

"Saddest of all is I can get over this loss, and believe so.kuch in the tech that I'd happily start buying again, but where is it truly safe?"

"@tradingroomapp @cz_binance @CryptoDonAlt does anyone know someone who could help please." "Going to file police reports etc not hopeful but fingers crossed." "Still with cyber crime unit, waiting for news, no nothing from Ledger."

The country for this case study is not yet known.

The background of the exchange platform, service, or individuals involved, as it would have been seen or understood at the time of the events.

Include:

  • Known history of when and how the service was started.
  • What problems does the company or service claim to solve?
  • What marketing materials were used by the firm or business?
  • Audits performed, and excerpts that may have been included.
  • Business registration documents shown (fake or legitimate).
  • How were people recruited to participate?
  • Public warnings and announcements prior to the event.

Don't Include:

  • Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
  • Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.

There could be more than one section here. If the same platform is involved with multiple incidents, then it can be linked to a main article page.

The Reality

This sections is included if a case involved deception or information that was unknown at the time. Examples include:

  • When the service was actually started (if different than the "official story").
  • Who actually ran a service and their own personal history.
  • How the service was structured behind the scenes. (For example, there was no "trading bot".)
  • Details of what audits reported and how vulnerabilities were missed during auditing.

What Happened

The specific events of the loss and how it came about. What actually happened to cause the loss and some of the events leading up to it.

Key Event Timeline - Ledger Funds Stolen Jpeezy555
Date Event Description
May 11th, 2019 3:27:00 AM Main Event Expand this into a brief description of what happened and the impact. If multiple lines are necessary, add them here.

Total Amount Lost

The total amount lost has been estimated at $47,000 USD.

How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?

Immediate Reactions

How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?

Ultimate Outcome

What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?

Total Amount Recovered

There do not appear to have been any funds recovered in this case.

What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?

Ongoing Developments

What parts of this case are still remaining to be concluded?

Prevention Policies

Which policies could have prevented this event from happening?

References