DMM Bitcoin Wallet Emptied

From Quadriga Initiative Cryptocurrency Hacks, Scams, and Frauds Repository
Revision as of 13:28, 17 September 2024 by Azoundria (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/dmmbitcoinwalletemptied.php}} {{Unattributed Sources}} thumb|DMM Bitcoin Logo/HomepageDMM Bitcoin is a large Japanese exchange platform, with colourful marketing depicting the bitcoin being lovingly held by a Japanese supermodel. Unfortunately, such security does not appear to have been very effective in preventing the bitcoin from getting stolen. Recovery is still underway...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notice: This page is a freshly imported case study from the original repository. The original content was in a different format, and may not have relevant information for all sections. Please help restructure the content by moving information from the 'About' section to other sections, and add any missing information or sources you can find. If you are new here, please read General Tutorial on Wikis or Anatomy of a Case Study for help getting started.

Notice: This page contains sources which are not attributed to any text. The unattributed sources follow the initial description. Please assist by visiting each source, reviewing the content, and placing that reference next to any text it can be used to support. Feel free to add any information that you come across which isn't present already. Sources which don't contain any relevant information can be removed. Broken links can be replaced with versions from the Internet Archive. See General Tutorial on Wikis, Anatomy of a Case Study, and/or Citing Your Sources Guide for additional information. Thanks for your help!

DMM Bitcoin Logo/Homepage

DMM Bitcoin is a large Japanese exchange platform, with colourful marketing depicting the bitcoin being lovingly held by a Japanese supermodel. Unfortunately, such security does not appear to have been very effective in preventing the bitcoin from getting stolen. Recovery is still underway.

This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.[1][2][3][4][5][6]

About DMM Bitcoin

"At around 13:26, we detected an outflow of Bitcoin (BTC) from our wallet.

Details of the damage situation will continue to be under investigation, but what is known at this stage is as follows. In addition, although we have already taken measures against fraudulent spills, we have implemented restrictions on the use of some services as much as possible to ensure additional safety."

"We would like to inform you separately regarding the resumption of service.

We deeply apologize for any inconvenience and concern to our customers in this event."

"The root cause of the attack has yet to be revealed, whether it is an address spoofing incident, private key compromise or even an inside job, remains to be seen."

"While on-chain sleuths have cracked some historic hacks, this trail of tainted coins spread across multiple addresses could prove a byzantine blockchain maze."

This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.

The background of the exchange platform, service, or individuals involved, as it would have been seen or understood at the time of the events.

Include:

  • Known history of when and how the service was started.
  • What problems does the company or service claim to solve?
  • What marketing materials were used by the firm or business?
  • Audits performed, and excerpts that may have been included.
  • Business registration documents shown (fake or legitimate).
  • How were people recruited to participate?
  • Public warnings and announcements prior to the event.

Don't Include:

  • Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.
  • Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.

There could be more than one section here. If the same platform is involved with multiple incidents, then it can be linked to a main article page.

The Reality

This sections is included if a case involved deception or information that was unknown at the time. Examples include:

  • When the service was actually started (if different than the "official story").
  • Who actually ran a service and their own personal history.
  • How the service was structured behind the scenes. (For example, there was no "trading bot".)
  • Details of what audits reported and how vulnerabilities were missed during auditing.

What Happened

The specific events of the loss and how it came about. What actually happened to cause the loss and some of the events leading up to it.

Key Event Timeline - DMM Bitcoin Wallet Emptied
Date Event Description
May 30th, 2024 10:12:49 PM MDT Blockchain Transaction The large transaction is recorded on the blockchain.
May 30th, 2024 10:14:00 PM MDT WhaleAlert Capture WhaleAlert reports that "4,502 #BTC (308,948,771 USD) transferred from unknown wallet to unknown new wallet".
May 30th, 2024 10:26:00 PM MDT Wallet Outflow Detected According to the official report, the outflow from the wallet was first detected at this time.
May 31st, 2024 7:14:39 AM MDT First Announcement Release DMM Bitcoin releases a "Report on fraudulent outflow of cryptographic assets" in Japanese. This is the first time the URL is captured. The report is absent a precise timestamp and only visible to residents of a limited geographic area, presumably Japan.
May 31st, 2024 7:31:34 AM MDT First Announcement Capture The text in Japanese is captured in the internet archive.

Technical Details

This section includes specific detailed technical analysis of any security breaches which happened. What specific software vulnerabilities contributed to the problem and how were they exploited?

Total Amount Lost

The total amount lost has been estimated at $308,949,000 USD.

How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?

Immediate Reactions

How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?

Ultimate Outcome

What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?

Total Amount Recovered

The total amount recovered is unknown.

What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?

Ongoing Developments

What parts of this case are still remaining to be concluded?

Individual Prevention Policies

No specific policies for individual prevention have yet been identified in this case.

For the full list of how to protect your funds as an individual, check our Prevention Policies for Individuals guide.

Platform Prevention Policies

Policies for platforms to take to prevent this situation have not yet been selected in this case.

For the full list of how to protect your funds as a financial service, check our Prevention Policies for Platforms guide.

Regulatory Prevention Policies

No specific regulatory policies have yet been identified in this case.

For the full list of regulatory policies that can prevent loss, check our Prevention Policies for Regulators guide.

References