Bondly Finance Admin Wallet Compromise: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

3 May 2023

22 February 2023

27 January 2023

  • curprev 15:0415:04, 27 January 2023Azoundria talk contribs 13,323 bytes +13,323 Created page with "{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/bondlyfinanceadminwalletcompromise.php}} thumb|BondlyBondly had a CEO who thought that the keys to all funds should be stored in his full control, with the access stored on a "hot" connected system where a hacker was able to gain access. Bondly heavily incentivized staking in their liquidity pool as opposed to holding tokens, by offering strong incentives to do so. This result..."