Bitrue Ethereum Classic 51% Attack: Revision history

3 September 2023

• curprev 23:0923:09, 3 September 2023‎ Azoundria talk contribs‎ 15,179 bytes +1,354‎ No edit summary

3 July 2023

• curprev 16:3516:35, 3 July 2023‎ Azoundria talk contribs‎ 13,825 bytes −19‎ No edit summary

1 May 2023

• curprev 12:5712:57, 1 May 2023‎ Azoundria talk contribs‎ 13,844 bytes +553‎ No edit summary

17 February 2023

• curprev 01:5101:51, 17 February 2023‎ Azoundria talk contribs‎ 13,291 bytes +1,557‎ No edit summary

24 January 2023

• curprev 15:4115:41, 24 January 2023‎ Azoundria talk contribs‎ 11,734 bytes +11,734‎ Created page with "{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/etc51bitrueattack.php}} thumb|BitrueA double-spend attack allows a less-mined blockchain (like Ethereum Classic) to be overpowered, enabling the rewriting of history, removing a spend event and allowing the hacker to respend those funds in a different way. The Ethereum Classic blockchain is vulnerable to 51% attacks due to the low hash power. Unknown victims (which may include..."