<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://quadrigainitiative.com/cryptocurrencyhackscamfraudwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Trezor_Hacked_By_Kraken_Security_Labs</id>
	<title>Trezor Hacked By Kraken Security Labs - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://quadrigainitiative.com/cryptocurrencyhackscamfraudwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Trezor_Hacked_By_Kraken_Security_Labs"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://quadrigainitiative.com/cryptocurrencyhackscamfraudwiki/index.php?title=Trezor_Hacked_By_Kraken_Security_Labs&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-20T00:43:13Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://quadrigainitiative.com/cryptocurrencyhackscamfraudwiki/index.php?title=Trezor_Hacked_By_Kraken_Security_Labs&amp;diff=4950&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Azoundria: Created page with &quot;{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/trezorhackedbykrakensecuritylabs.php}} {{Unattributed Sources}}  TrezorTrezor doesn't use a Secure Element, leaving their devices susceptible to physical hacking attacks involving opening and tampering. Kaspersky Labs reported that Trezor uses a single STM32 chip, storing the private key in its non-volatile flash memory. Kraken Security Labs demonstrated how they exploited...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://quadrigainitiative.com/cryptocurrencyhackscamfraudwiki/index.php?title=Trezor_Hacked_By_Kraken_Security_Labs&amp;diff=4950&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2023-09-01T16:01:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/trezorhackedbykrakensecuritylabs.php}} {{Unattributed Sources}}  &lt;a href=&quot;/cryptocurrencyhackscamfraudwiki/index.php?title=File:Trezor.jpg&quot; title=&quot;File:Trezor.jpg&quot;&gt;thumb|Trezor&lt;/a&gt;Trezor doesn&amp;#039;t use a Secure Element, leaving their devices susceptible to physical hacking attacks involving opening and tampering. Kaspersky Labs reported that Trezor uses a single STM32 chip, storing the private key in its non-volatile flash memory. Kraken Security Labs demonstrated how they exploited...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Imported Case Study|source=https://www.quadrigainitiative.com/casestudy/trezorhackedbykrakensecuritylabs.php}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Unattributed Sources}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trezor.jpg|thumb|Trezor]]Trezor doesn't use a Secure Element, leaving their devices susceptible to physical hacking attacks involving opening and tampering. Kaspersky Labs reported that Trezor uses a single STM32 chip, storing the private key in its non-volatile flash memory. Kraken Security Labs demonstrated how they exploited this vulnerability using a &amp;quot;glitching device&amp;quot; to extract an encrypted seed, then used brute force to crack the seed's PIN. They estimated that a consumer-friendly glitching device could be mass-produced for $75. Trezor acknowledged the attack and the significance of ethical hacking, suggesting users activate the BIP39 passphrase for protection until a hardware redesign is implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;redditold-11513&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;coolwallet-11514&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube-11515&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;krakenblog-11516&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;redditold-11517&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About Trezor ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Trezor is known for not taking criticism lying down. After the Ledger Donjon’s disclosure in March 2019 of several vulnerabilities in the Trezor models, Trezor responded with a strong-worded response, countering with arguments like the “$5 wrench attack” fallacy, stating that it didn’t matter how secure your device was, it only mattered how well you protected your private key and seed passphrase against intruders.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Trezor doesn’t use a Secure Element and therefore their devices are vulnerable to physical hacking attacks where the device is opened and then tampered with. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a report by Kaspersky Labs, Trezor only uses a single STM32 chip, a general-purpose microcontroller based on ARM architecture, where they store the private key in its non-volatile flash memory.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In short, here’s how the security firm did it: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They used the equipment to build a “glitching device” to extract the hardware wallet’s encrypted seed by attacking the STM32 microchip. &lt;br /&gt;
They then used brute force to crack the encrypted seed (protected by a 1-9 digit PIN) within a few minutes to gain access to the device.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This attack relies on voltage glitching to extract an encrypted seed. This initial research required some know-how and several hundred dollars of equipment, but we estimate that we (or criminals) could mass produce a consumer-friendly glitching device that could be sold for about $75.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Kraken Security Labs say the weakness is in the microcontroller of the Trezor wallets, therefore it will require a complete overhaul of the cold storage device’s design. Trezor is aware of this weakness but hasn’t made any changes yet.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This time, Trezor acknowledged the security attack and the importance of ethical hacking by third parties to help improve the overall security of the crypto industry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Kraken suggested in the meantime, Trezor users activate their BIP39 passphrase with a Trezor client in order to protect the wallet, as it’s not stored on the actual hardware wallet.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a global/international case not involving a specific country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The background of the exchange platform, service, or individuals involved, as it would have been seen or understood at the time of the events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Known history of when and how the service was started.&lt;br /&gt;
* What problems does the company or service claim to solve?&lt;br /&gt;
* What marketing materials were used by the firm or business?&lt;br /&gt;
* Audits performed, and excerpts that may have been included.&lt;br /&gt;
* Business registration documents shown (fake or legitimate).&lt;br /&gt;
* How were people recruited to participate?&lt;br /&gt;
* Public warnings and announcements prior to the event.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't Include:&lt;br /&gt;
* Any wording which directly states or implies that the business is/was illegitimate, or that a vulnerability existed.&lt;br /&gt;
* Anything that wasn't reasonably knowable at the time of the event.&lt;br /&gt;
There could be more than one section here. If the same platform is involved with multiple incidents, then it can be linked to a main article page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Reality ==&lt;br /&gt;
This sections is included if a case involved deception or information that was unknown at the time. Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* When the service was actually started (if different than the &amp;quot;official story&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
* Who actually ran a service and their own personal history.&lt;br /&gt;
* How the service was structured behind the scenes. (For example, there was no &amp;quot;trading bot&amp;quot;.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Details of what audits reported and how vulnerabilities were missed during auditing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What Happened ==&lt;br /&gt;
The specific events of the loss and how it came about. What actually happened to cause the loss and some of the events leading up to it.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Key Event Timeline - Trezor Hacked By Kraken Security Labs&lt;br /&gt;
!Date&lt;br /&gt;
!Event&lt;br /&gt;
!Description&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|October 30th, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
|Disclosure Of Attack&lt;br /&gt;
|The Kraken Security Team discloses the issue to Trezor.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|January 31st, 2020 7:57:29 AM MST&lt;br /&gt;
|Reddit Thread&lt;br /&gt;
|The issue is discussed on Reddit.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical Details ==&lt;br /&gt;
This section includes specific detailed technical analysis of any security breaches which happened. What specific software vulnerabilities contributed to the problem and how were they exploited?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Total Amount Lost ==&lt;br /&gt;
No funds were lost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How much was lost and how was it calculated? If there are conflicting reports, which are accurate and where does the discrepancy lie?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Immediate Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
How did the various parties involved (firm, platform, management, and/or affected individual(s)) deal with the events? Were services shut down? Were announcements made? Were groups formed?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ultimate Outcome ==&lt;br /&gt;
What was the end result? Was any investigation done? Were any individuals prosecuted? Was there a lawsuit? Was any tracing done?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Total Amount Recovered ==&lt;br /&gt;
There do not appear to have been any funds recovered in this case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What funds were recovered? What funds were reimbursed for those affected users?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ongoing Developments ==&lt;br /&gt;
What parts of this case are still remaining to be concluded?&lt;br /&gt;
== Individual Prevention Policies ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Prevention:Individuals:Placeholder}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Prevention:Individuals:End}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Platform Prevention Policies ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Prevention:Platforms:Placeholder}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Prevention:Platforms:End}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regulatory Prevention Policies ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Prevention:Regulators:Placeholder}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Prevention:Regulators:End}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;redditold-11513&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/ewplf5/it_took_kraken_security_labs_just_15_minutes_to/fg5y0ss/ normal_rc comments on It took Kraken Security Labs just 15 minutes to hack both of @trezor’s crypto hardware wallets.] (Oct 17, 2022)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;coolwallet-11514&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.coolwallet.io/kraken-hacks-trezor-in-15-minutes/ https://www.coolwallet.io/kraken-hacks-trezor-in-15-minutes/] (Aug 23, 2023)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube-11515&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pKuHYwrGkU Kraken Identifies Critical Flaw in Trezor Hardware Wallets - YouTube] (Aug 23, 2023)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;krakenblog-11516&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://blog.kraken.com/product/security/kraken-identifies-critical-flaw-in-trezor-hardware-wallets Kraken Identifies Critical Flaw in Trezor Hardware Wallets «  Kraken Blog] (Aug 23, 2023)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;redditold-11517&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://old.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/ewplf5/it_took_kraken_security_labs_just_15_minutes_to/ It took Kraken Security Labs just 15 minutes to hack both of @trezor’s crypto hardware wallets. : CryptoCurrency] (Aug 23, 2023)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/references&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Azoundria</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>